But whether this is a problem or not depends on their relationship.

…depends not only on the signature of “b” but also on its semantic. Both are strongly tide together. You cannot reason about “a” without “b”. So, “a” mixes up the both concerns integration and operation.
My point here is, we — as software engineers — are often mixing up two different concerns — the…
8
Denis Kuniß
Markus Voelter
·Follow
1 min read·
Oct 18, 2017
--
But whether this is a problem or not depends on their relationship. If b is an integral part of a’s semantics, than this is fine. Remember Pascal? There you might have written b as a private (syntactically nested) function inside of a. No problem here AFAICT.
--
--
Written by Markus Voelter716 Followers
·88 Following
software (language) engineer, science & engineering podcaster, cross-country glider pilot. On medium mostly for the software stuff.
Responses (1)
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams